Tihany Centre for Political Analysis
  • About us
    • About us
    • Director
  • Aims and goals
  • Main target topics
    • European cooperation
    • Hungary from abroad – how others evaluate us
    • Transatlantic relations
  • News and events
  • Conference and workshop in Tihany 2015 May
  • Referred links
  • Contact us
  • Magyar
  • Tihany Centre for Political Analysis – Wien

Hungary to assess Sputnik V vaccine for Slovakia use

It’s the latest twist in a row involving Slovakia’s ex-prime minister, its drugs regulator and Russia over Sputnik V.

A Hungarian laboratory will assess the Russian Sputnik V vaccine for use in Slovakia, Hungary’s Foreign Minister Péter Szijjártó said Friday.

“Our Slovak friends asked us to help them in the expert assessment of vaccines coming from Russia to Slovakia. We are happy to meet this requirement because we have the capacity, internationally accredited laboratories and knowledge,” Szijjártó said at a news conference in Budapest.

The move is the latest twist in a row involving Slovakia’s ex-prime minister, its drugs regulator and Russia over the quality of batches of the vaccine delivered to Slovakia in March.

Igor Matovič, who was Slovakia’s prime minister at the time, secretly ordered 2 million doses of the Sputnik V vaccine for his country, triggering a revolt among his coalition partners and forcing him out of office. He is now finance minister in the new government.

On Thursday, the Russian Direct Investment Fund (RDIF), which promotes the vaccine outside Russia, demanded the Slovak government return the 200,000 Sputnik V doses already shipped to the country, alleging “multiple contract violations.”

That followed a negative assessment of the vaccine by the Slovak drugs regulator ŠÚKL, which on Thursday said that the Sputnik V doses delivered were different to those supplied elsewhere or to the European Medicines Agency. The ŠÚKL also said the Russians failed to provide sufficient data on the jab.

“Batches of vaccine used in preclinical tests and clinical studies published in the Lancet [medical journal] do not have the same characteristics and properties as batches of vaccine imported to Slovakia,” the ŠÚKL wrote in its opinion.

The RDIF dismissed the ŠÚKL’s assessment as “fake news.” It said all Sputnik V batches are “of the same quality and undergo rigorous quality control.”

Hungary and Slovakia are so far the only EU countries to order the Sputnik V vaccine, which has not been approved for use by the European Medicines Agency.

Following a visit Thursday to Moscow, Matovič said Friday in Bratislava — he also attended Szijjártó’s Budapest news conference — that the Russians had terminated the Slovak contract because they felt “extremely damaged” by the fact that the ŠÚKL had entrusted the testing of the vaccine to an unregistered laboratory.

That charge was immediately refuted by the institute in charge of the testing, the Biomedical Center of the Slovak Academy of Sciences (BMC SAS).

That’s “not true,” the BMC said in a statement. “Eight of the 14 tests were performed in the Biotechnology Laboratories of the BMC SAS, which are registered in the European database EudraGMP and certified to perform microbiological, chemical and biological tests of drugs.”

The remaining six tests were carried out in the laboratories of the BMC’s Institute of Virology, with the approval of the Slovak health ministry and the ŠÚKL.

“Therefore, our results could not damage the reputation of the manufacturer,” the BMC declared.

However, the RDIF had complained in a tweet that the vaccine had not been tested in an accredited EU Official Medicines Control Laboratory (OMCL), which the BMC SAS is not. This was a “violation of [the] existing contract and an act of sabotage,” the fund said.

“At the moment, we have no evidence that [Sputnik V] is safe or that it is dangerous,” ŠÚKL director Zuzana Baťová said. “We have too little information.”

However, she welcomed the Hungarian laboratory testing the vaccine, noting that the ŠÚKL had asked it three times to perform such testing, but had been turned down because the vaccine was not registered.

Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said the ŠÚKL’s negative assessment of the vaccine would not undermine EU confidence in the jab.

“If Slovakia doesn’t need the vaccine, other countries will be pleased … there will be more for others,” Peskov said.

(9. 4. 2021. via politico.eu)

Posted in European cooperation |
« Professor Nein: Economist threatens EU recovery fund
German conservatives seek Angela Merkel’s successor »

Leave a comment Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Pages

  • About us
  • Aims and goals
  • Contact us
  • Director
  • Events and news
  • Main target topics
  • Referred links
  • Tihany Centre for Political Analysis – Wien
  • About us

Archives

  • November 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • September 2017
  • November 2016
  • September 2016
  • July 2016
  • March 2016
  • November 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014

Categories

  • Conference and workshop in Tihany 2015 May (11)
  • Egyéb (1)
  • English (8)
  • European cooperation (386)
  • Hírek, aktuális események (50)
  • Hungary from abroad – how others evaluate us (127)
  • News and events (24)
  • Transatlantic relations (114)

WordPress

  • Log in
  • WordPress

Subscribe

  • Entries (RSS)
  • Comments (RSS)

Pages

  • About us
  • Aims and goals
  • Contact us
  • Director
  • Events and news
  • Main target topics
  • Referred links
  • Tihany Centre for Political Analysis – Wien
  • About us

Archives

  • November 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • September 2017
  • November 2016
  • September 2016
  • July 2016
  • March 2016
  • November 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014

Categories

  • Conference and workshop in Tihany 2015 May (11)
  • Egyéb (1)
  • English (8)
  • European cooperation (386)
  • Hírek, aktuális események (50)
  • Hungary from abroad – how others evaluate us (127)
  • News and events (24)
  • Transatlantic relations (114)

WordPress

  • Log in
  • WordPress

CyberChimps WordPress Themes

© tihanypolitics